Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
D
Dnsmasq
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Locked Files
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Security & Compliance
Security & Compliance
Dependency List
License Compliance
Packages
Packages
List
Container Registry
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Code Review
Insights
Issues
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nanahira
Dnsmasq
Commits
0669ee7a
Commit
0669ee7a
authored
May 04, 2018
by
Simon Kelley
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Fix DHCP broken-ness when --no-ping AND --dhcp-sequential-ip are set.
parent
f84e674d
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
3 additions
and
2 deletions
+3
-2
CHANGELOG
CHANGELOG
+2
-1
src/dhcp.c
src/dhcp.c
+1
-1
No files found.
CHANGELOG
View file @
0669ee7a
...
...
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ version 2.80
when the upstream namesevers do not support DNSSEC, and in this
case no DNSSEC validation at all is occuring.
Fix DHCP broken-ness when --no-ping AND --dhcp-sequential-ip
are set. Thanks to Daniel Miess for help with this.
version 2.79
...
...
src/dhcp.c
View file @
0669ee7a
...
...
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ struct ping_result *do_icmp_ping(time_t now, struct in_addr addr, unsigned int h
if
((
count
>=
max
)
||
option_bool
(
OPT_NO_PING
)
||
loopback
)
{
/* overloaded, or configured not to check, loopback interface, return "not in use" */
dummy
.
hash
=
0
;
dummy
.
hash
=
hash
;
return
&
dummy
;
}
else
if
(
icmp_ping
(
addr
))
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment